Standards & Alignment

Our credentials are not a private taxonomy.

Every competency the Institute certifies is mapped to the external frameworks the field converged on — and that alignment is written into the signed credential itself, so a wallet, a verifier, or an employer's skills system reads it straight off the badge. This is what makes a skill earned here mean the same thing everywhere else.

The competency ladder →Machine-readable framework ↗Our signing key (did:web) ↗
The tiers line up

Three levels, one shared progression.

Our competency tiers are not idiosyncratic — they correspond one-to-one with the progressions the major frameworks already use. Earn a tier here and its meaning is legible against UNESCO's and SACA's ladders.

Institute tierUNESCO AI (students)SACA (Industry 4.0)
I FoundationalUnderstandAssociate
II ProficientApplySpecialist
III AdvancedCreateProfessional
The crosswalk

Seven competencies, mapped.

Each mapping is deliberately conservative — grounded in what the courses in that competency actually teach, not aspirational. Every entry is a live link into the external framework.

Make

Parametric Design

Make

Additive Manufacturing

Electronics Integration

Embedded & Silicon

Physical AI

Robot Learning

Physical AI

Vision-Language-Action

Physical AI

Embodied Systems

Foundations

Intelligence Foundations

The frameworks we align to

Where the field converged.

The reference frameworks and standards bodies our credentials point at.

UNESCO AI Competency Framework for Students ↗

The international reference (Sept 2024): competencies across four aspects, each progressing Understand → Apply → Create.

OECD / European Commission AI Literacy Framework (AILit) ↗

The AILit framework, final June 2026: 19 competences across four domains — Engage with AI, Create with AI, Manage AI, Shape AI. The basis for the PISA 2029 AI-literacy assessment.

CSTA 2026 PK-12 Computer Science Standards ↗

The July 2026 CSTA standards: five concepts, four practices, and high-school specialties — including Physical Computing (PHY) and Artificial Intelligence (AIN).

AI4K12 — Five Big Ideas in AI ↗

The AAAI + CSTA grade-band framework: Perception, Representation & Reasoning, Learning, Natural Interaction, Societal Impact.

WorldSkills Occupational Standards ↗

Absolute occupational standards scored at global competitions — Additive Manufacturing, Mechatronics, Mobile Robotics, Robot Systems Integration.

Smart Automation Certification Alliance (SACA) ↗

Industry-4.0 / connected-systems credentials, stacked Associate → Specialist → Professional.

NIMS — Additive Manufacturing Credentials ↗

US metalworking/AM standards body: performance-validated Additive Manufacturing Designer and Operator credentials.

1EdTech CASE (Competencies & Academic Standards Exchange) ↗

The machine-readable exchange format so a competency means the same thing across systems — the format our framework export uses.

Alignment is in the credential, not just on this page

Machine-readable, end to end.

The crosswalk above is not marketing copy bolted on afterward — it is the same data that is signed into every credential we issue and published as a framework other systems can align to.

IN EVERY BADGE

OB 3.0 alignment

Each competency credential is an Open Badges 3.0 / W3C Verifiable Credential whose achievement carries an alignment array — the exact framework, code, name, and URL — signed with our Ed25519 key. A verifier reads the standards mapping without trusting us.

OUR FRAMEWORK, PUBLISHED

A CASE-shaped export

Our whole ladder is published as a machine-readable framework (1EdTech CASE vocabulary — CFDocument + CFItems) so other systems can align to us the way we align to them.

/credentials/framework.json →

VERIFY IT YOURSELF

did:web + offline check

Our public signing key is published at did:web:physicalai-bmi.org. Any wallet or verifier validates a credential — and its alignment — offline, with no call back to us.

/.well-known/did.json →

Honest scope: mappings are conservative and self-asserted — a credential's alignment is our documented claim, not a third-party accreditation. The CASE export uses the CASE vocabulary but is not yet run through the 1EdTech conformance suite. The VC-JWT is EdDSA (valid W3C VC); some OB3-specific validators historically tested only RS256 — a one-line fallback exists if a target validator requires it.