Since 2020 it has been known that softmax attention and the modern Hopfield network are the same object: write an energy that rewards a query for overlapping the stored patterns and penalises its length, and attention's output is what you get by taking one step downhill on it. That identity is the bridge the case for running AI on thermodynamic hardware usually leans on, because a thermodynamic chip is a machine that goes downhill. The next step people take is the one to check. If attention is an energy, then a chip that settles into that energy computes attention. It does not, and the reason is in the word one. Attention is exactly one gradient step, of size exactly one. Settling is as many steps as it takes, and it ends at the energy's minimum. The two land in the same place only in one corner: when the query already sits on a stored pattern and the softmax is sharp. That corner is the assumption behind the original paper's one-step retrieval result, and it is the case where the head had nothing to do. A query near no pattern, which is what a real attention head is handed, settles somewhere else at every sharpness measured: more than half the answer's length away here at the sharpest softmax, and between forty-one and seventy-eight percent on average in sixteen dimensions. So the substitution is not a speed-up with a constant to argue about. It computes a different function. What a settling substrate can offer attention is the one step, not the settling.